A boutique law firm of exceptional quality and talent where clients' and lawyers' interests are aligned by collaboration and innovation
The appeal of London for International divorce
Several factors contribute to London being a preferred location for international divorce proceedings:
1. Judicial expertise: The English family law system is renowned for its fairness, incorruptibility and clarity. The courts in London, particularly the High Court and the Family Division, are equipped with judges who have extensive experience in complex financial matters, international child custody disputes, and intricate property settlements. Judges in the UK often earn more as practising lawyers than they do in judicial office with their primary motivations being status, the chance to make case law (and on the odd occasion a defined benefit public sector pension scheme).
2. Legal framework: The Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 provides a robust legal framework for divorce in England and Wales. It allows for the division of assets based on fairness rather than a strict formula, which can be particularly advantageous in high-net-worth cases. Ensuing case law has set down precedents and the law continues to evolve in a holistic manner rather than a laid down, constraining set of rules. Other legislation such as the Family Law Act 1986 robustly deals with recognition of foreign marriages, the Family Law Act 1996 deals (amongst other things) with domestic violence matters and the Children Act 1989 allow the full gamut of family law matters to be dealt with. Meanwhile the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 provides the ability for the English court to deal with the finances of a marriage via the English system even if the divorce has taken place abroad (depending on the factual matrix of the case and the parties connection/assets to the English jurisdiction).
3. No-Fault divorce: The recent introduction of no-fault divorce in England and Wales, effective from April 2022, has simplified the process. This reform allows couples to divorce without assigning blame, reducing conflict and making the process more amicable. Previously the most common reason for divorce was “unreasonable behaviour” and you had to set out what behaviour of your spouse you deemed unreasonable - this often increased acrimony and at times elongated proceedings, court time and costs. No fault divorce is not a panacea to unclogging the court system and stopping divorcing parties from arguing about money, children or pets, but it at least it takes the heat out the actual divorce process itself.
4. Global Connections: London’s status as a major financial and cultural centre means it is home to many expatriates and individuals with international ties. This diversity often leads to complex cases involving multiple jurisdictions, where London’s legal system and legal community can effectively navigate the intricacies. Probably 80% of the writer of this article’s legal practice has included some sort of foreign component to family proceedings.
Recent case law illustrates how London continues to lead in international divorce matters:
1. Radmacher v. Granatino [2010]: This landmark case established that pre-nuptial agreements could be enforceable in England, provided they are entered into freely and with a full understanding of their implications. This decision has had significant implications for international marriages, where parties may have different legal traditions regarding asset division. There have been various Law Commission reports regarding enshrining pre-nuptial agreements into the statute books, but to date this has not taken place.
2. Z v. Z (Financial Remedy: Non-Molestation Order) [2021]: This case highlighted the English court's approach to protecting vulnerable individuals in divorce proceedings. The court addressed the intersection of financial remedies and domestic abuse, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding individuals while ensuring fair financial settlements.
3. A v. A (Financial Remedy: Needs) [2022]: In this case, the court reinforced the principle that the financial needs of both parties must be considered, especially when children are involved. The judgment stressed the importance of addressing the needs of children in international divorces, which often involve complex custody arrangements.
4. K v. K (Financial Remedy: International Jurisdiction) [2023]: This recent case underscored the jurisdictional challenges in international divorce cases. The court ruled that it had jurisdiction to hear the case despite the parties having connections to multiple countries, thereby affirming London's position as a suitable forum for resolving such disputes.
London's reputation as an international divorce centre continues to grow, supported by its robust legal framework, judicial expertise, and recent case law that reflects its adaptability to complex international issues. As couples increasingly seek to navigate the intricacies of divorce across borders, London stands out as a jurisdiction that offers both fairness and efficiency. The city’s blend of tradition and modernity in family law ensures that it will remain a leading choice for individuals seeking resolution to their marital disputes on the global stage.
To discuss any of the above further, please contact Aziz: azizmalik@bexleybeaumont.com | 07966 375115
